Corrections
This page explains what counts as a correction on Casual Seek, how to report one, and where corrections are logged.
What Counts as a Correction
A correction is a factual error that changes the substance of an article: a wrong cost figure, a rule or rate presented as current when it is not, a program credited with terms it does not have, math that does not hold up. When we make one, we fix the article, note the change in the article itself, and log it on this page with the date and what changed.
Routine maintenance is not a correction. Refreshed figures, updated links, and rewrites that bring an article up to current standards are recorded on our changelog instead. The line between the two is substance: if the error could have changed what you decided or believed, it belongs here.
How to Report an Error
Email info@intermediadm.com with a link to the article and a note on what is wrong. We read every message, and corrections are the highest-priority mail we get. You do not need to prove the error; pointing at it is enough, and we will do the verifying. If you are right, we will fix the article and log the fix here.
Corrections Log
September 9, 2026
A full-site review ahead of our advertising application surfaced a batch of substantive problems. All were corrected the same day:
- Fabricated comparison withdrawn. "Air Fryer Showdown: Top Brands Battle for Crispy Supremacy" claimed hands-on testing of two brands it never named, complete with invented scores and chef testimonials. No such testing took place. The article has been unpublished.
- Wi-Fi claim corrected. Our router guide said Wi-Fi 7 promises real-world speeds up to 25 percent faster. The cited source attributes that figure to Wi-Fi 8, not Wi-Fi 7. The claim now says what the source says.
- Walking statistics re-anchored. The daily-walking article cited institutions without links. Each health claim has been matched to the published study that supports it and linked inline, and a creativity figure was restated to match what the linked study actually reports.
- Untraceable case studies removed. Two credit card articles cited forum cases and unnamed research we could not trace. Those passages were rewritten as plain arithmetic illustrations that a reader can check.
- False advertising notices removed. Four credit card articles carried boilerplate saying compensation may affect where offers appear. This site has no paid placements, so the notices were wrong. They are gone.
- Personal testing claims removed. Roughly two dozen articles claimed first-person testing or years of hands-on experience that did not happen. Those claims were removed and the guidance restated plainly; two personal essays that could not stand without them were unpublished.
An error you can no longer find is still an error we made. If you spot one we missed, email us; corrections remain the mail we read first.